핵심 요구사항
- IFC 연합 모델을 Revit에서 열어 전 분야 요소 점검
- 분야 간 간섭 검출 및 조정 검토
- 모델 완전성·데이터 필드 일관성 검증
- 수량 산출(BoQ/QTO) 및 스케줄 정보 검증
- 모든 관찰 사항을 뷰/객체 ID로 추적 가능하게 기록
Required stack
필요 기술
RevitNavisworksSolibriIFCBIM
Project brief
프로젝트 내용
I am preparing a federated IFC building model for issue and need an experienced BIM professional to give it a thorough health-check. You will open the file in Revit—this is the environment my team works in—then examine every architectural, structural and MEP element, including the boq analysic information embedded in the objects.
The review must cover:
• Clashes and overall coordination between disciplines
• Model completeness and consistency, both geometrically and in the data fields
• Quantities and other schedule information contained in the model data
Work through the full structure: inspect the hierarchy, check object parameters, run clash detection, validate quantity take-offs and spot any missing or mislabeled components. Where Navisworks or Solibri can strengthen the clash or rules-based checking you are free to use them, but the core audit should stay within Revit so I can easily reproduce your viewpoints.
Deliverables
1. A written technical report (PDF) detailing every issue, grouped by discipline and severity, with screenshots or marked-up views.
2. An itemised recommendation list explaining how to resolve each clash, inconsistency or data gap.
3. If you generate viewpoints, selection sets or Revit mark-ups, include the corresponding RVT or NWD file so I can navigate directly to each problem area.
Acceptance criteria: all clashes are logged, any incomplete or inconsistent elements are clearly identified, quantity discrepancies are quantified, and every observation is traceable to a view or object ID in the supplied files.
The IFC will be sent once we start; I aim to review your findings within two working days of delivery, so please outline the time you need to complete the audit when you respond.
The review must cover:
• Clashes and overall coordination between disciplines
• Model completeness and consistency, both geometrically and in the data fields
• Quantities and other schedule information contained in the model data
Work through the full structure: inspect the hierarchy, check object parameters, run clash detection, validate quantity take-offs and spot any missing or mislabeled components. Where Navisworks or Solibri can strengthen the clash or rules-based checking you are free to use them, but the core audit should stay within Revit so I can easily reproduce your viewpoints.
Deliverables
1. A written technical report (PDF) detailing every issue, grouped by discipline and severity, with screenshots or marked-up views.
2. An itemised recommendation list explaining how to resolve each clash, inconsistency or data gap.
3. If you generate viewpoints, selection sets or Revit mark-ups, include the corresponding RVT or NWD file so I can navigate directly to each problem area.
Acceptance criteria: all clashes are logged, any incomplete or inconsistent elements are clearly identified, quantity discrepancies are quantified, and every observation is traceable to a view or object ID in the supplied files.
The IFC will be sent once we start; I aim to review your findings within two working days of delivery, so please outline the time you need to complete the audit when you respond.
지원 기회 분석
지원 전에 볼 것
예상 산출물
- 이슈를 분야·심각도별로 정리한 기술 보고서(PDF, 스크린샷 포함)
- 각 간섭·불일치·데이터 공백의 해결 권고 목록
- 뷰포인트·선택세트·마크업이 담긴 RVT 또는 NWD 파일
매력 포인트
- 요구사항과 산출물이 명확하게 정의됨
- 수용 기준이 구체적으로 제시됨
확인할 점
- 예산 통화 표기 혼란($와 INR 혼용)으로 실제 금액 불명확
- 기간 미명시, IFC 파일은 착수 후 전달되어 범위 사전 파악 어려움
Client signal
클라이언트 정보
플랫폼에서 상세 정보를 확인하세요.