INTL
Freelancer
보통
외주
원격 가능
IFC Model Review & Validation -- 2
예산
$12,500~$37,500 INR
예상 기간
1~2주
난이도
보통
기술 스택
Revit
Navisworks
Solibri
IFC
BIM
AI 분석 요약 기회점수 58/100
연합(federated) IFC 건축 모델을 Revit에서 열어 건축·구조·MEP 요소를 점검하는 BIM 모델 검증/감사 프로젝트입니다. 간섭(clash) 검출, 모델 완전성·일관성 확인, 수량 산출(BoQ) 검증을 수행하고 이슈별 기술 보고서와 권고안, 마크업 파일을 제출해야 합니다. Revit 중심으로 작업하되 Navisworks나 Solibri를 보조로 활용할 수 있으며, BIM 조정 경험이 있는 건설/구조 엔지니어에게 적합합니다.
핵심 요구사항
- IFC 연합 모델을 Revit에서 열어 전 분야 요소 점검
- 분야 간 간섭 검출 및 조정 검토
- 모델 완전성·데이터 필드 일관성 검증
- 수량 산출(BoQ/QTO) 및 스케줄 정보 검증
- 모든 관찰 사항을 뷰/객체 ID로 추적 가능하게 기록
산출물
- 이슈를 분야·심각도별로 정리한 기술 보고서(PDF, 스크린샷 포함)
- 각 간섭·불일치·데이터 공백의 해결 권고 목록
- 뷰포인트·선택세트·마크업이 담긴 RVT 또는 NWD 파일
매력 포인트
- 요구사항과 산출물이 명확하게 정의됨
- 수용 기준이 구체적으로 제시됨
주의사항
- 예산 통화 표기 혼란($와 INR 혼용)으로 실제 금액 불명확
- 기간 미명시, IFC 파일은 착수 후 전달되어 범위 사전 파악 어려움
프로젝트 유형컨설팅
적합 개발자3년차 이상 BIM 코디네이터/구조 엔지니어 (Revit + Navisworks/Solibri)
클라이언트 정보
지원자6명
평균 입찰가$16,603
프로젝트 원문 설명
I am preparing a federated IFC building model for issue and need an experienced BIM professional to give it a thorough health-check. You will open the file in Revit—this is the environment my team works in—then examine every architectural, structural and MEP element, including the boq analysic information embedded in the objects.
The review must cover:
• Clashes and overall coordination between disciplines
• Model completeness and consistency, both geometrically and in the data fields
• Quantities and other schedule information contained in the model data
Work through the full structure: inspect the hierarchy, check object parameters, run clash detection, validate quantity take-offs and spot any missing or mislabeled components. Where Navisworks or Solibri can strengthen the clash or rules-based checking you are free to use them, but the core audit should stay within Revit so I can easily reproduce your viewpoints.
Deliverables
1. A written technical report (PDF) detailing every issue, grouped by discipline and severity, with screenshots or marked-up views.
2. An itemised recommendation list explaining how to resolve each clash, inconsistency or data gap.
3. If you generate viewpoints, selection sets or Revit mark-ups, include the corresponding RVT or NWD file so I can navigate directly to each problem area.
Acceptance criteria: all clashes are logged, any incomplete or inconsistent elements are clearly identified, quantity discrepancies are quantified, and every observation is traceable to a view or object ID in the supplied files.
The IFC will be sent once we start; I aim to review your findings within two working days of delivery, so please outline the time you need to complete the audit when you respond.
The review must cover:
• Clashes and overall coordination between disciplines
• Model completeness and consistency, both geometrically and in the data fields
• Quantities and other schedule information contained in the model data
Work through the full structure: inspect the hierarchy, check object parameters, run clash detection, validate quantity take-offs and spot any missing or mislabeled components. Where Navisworks or Solibri can strengthen the clash or rules-based checking you are free to use them, but the core audit should stay within Revit so I can easily reproduce your viewpoints.
Deliverables
1. A written technical report (PDF) detailing every issue, grouped by discipline and severity, with screenshots or marked-up views.
2. An itemised recommendation list explaining how to resolve each clash, inconsistency or data gap.
3. If you generate viewpoints, selection sets or Revit mark-ups, include the corresponding RVT or NWD file so I can navigate directly to each problem area.
Acceptance criteria: all clashes are logged, any incomplete or inconsistent elements are clearly identified, quantity discrepancies are quantified, and every observation is traceable to a view or object ID in the supplied files.
The IFC will be sent once we start; I aim to review your findings within two working days of delivery, so please outline the time you need to complete the audit when you respond.
Freelancer에서 원본 확인
원본 보기